Haloferax volcanii Methanosprillum hungatei
Optimal Accuracy1 80% 46%
Total Fold Predictions (Optimal + Suboptimal) 750 750
Total Pairwise Comparisions 280,875 280,875
Structural variation score of 1 to 50    
Num of Pairwise Comparisions 32,378 12%2 11,016 4%
ΔΔG Min (kcal/mol) 0 0
ΔΔG Max (kcal/mol) 11 8.6
ΔΔG Average (kcal/mol) 2.84 2.19
Structural variation score of 51 to 100    
Num of Pairwise Comparisions 102,071 36% 32,360 12%
ΔΔG Min (kcal/mol) 0 0
ΔΔG Max (kcal/mol) 11 8.6
ΔΔG Average (kcal/mol) 2.53 2.19
Structural variation score of 101 to 500    
Num of Pairwise Comparisions 121,805 43% 134,037 48%
ΔΔG Min (kcal/mol) 0 0
ΔΔG Max (kcal/mol) 11 8.6
ΔΔG Average (kcal/mol) 2.24 1.74
Structural variation score of 501+    
Num of Pairwise Comparisions 24,621 9% 103,462 37%
ΔΔG Min (kcal/mol) 0 0
ΔΔG Max (kcal/mol) 11 8.6
ΔΔG Average (kcal/mol) 2.24 1.82

† Both sequences are 16S rRNAs. For each sequence, MFold 3.1 predicts one optimal or minimum free energy fold and 749 suboptimals folds (750 total folds). Pairwise comparisions are grouped based on the structural variation between the two folds compared. For details on how structural variation between two folds is calculated see Suboptimal Structural Variation Score in Methods. The range of ΔΔG values observed is 0-11 kcal/mol for H. volcanii and 0-8.60 kcal/mol for M. hungatei, and all ΔG values are pre-efn2 re-evaluation.
1 Without efn2 re-evaluation and re-ordering of predicted folds.
2 Percentage of total pairwise comparisions.