Last modified on 11 October 2011.
Literature Reference:
Gardner D.P., Ren P., Ozer S. & Gutell R.R. (2011).
Statistical Potentials for Hairpin and Internal Loops Improve the Accuracy of the Predicted RNA Structure.
Journal of Molecular Biology, 413(2): 473-483.
Manuscript Figures:
Figure 1. Top 20 Comparative / Potential ratio for tetraloops. | |
Figure 2. Comparison of Statistical Potentials vs 4 other RNA folding programs. | |
Figure 3. Identification of Comparative and Potential hairpin and internal loops. |
Supplemental Information:
Prediction Accuracies for Statistical Potentials and four other RNA folding programs | This spreadsheet (Excel 2010) contains the RNA secondary structure prediction accuracies of the new statistical potentials and four other RNA folding programs. The results for the 25 RNA molecular classes used in this studied are found on tab ProgramComp. Additionally, the results for the statistical potentials are broken down further in the following manner:
|
Supplemental data PDF | This PDF contains the following:
|
Hairpin Comparative / Potential ratios for bacterial 16S rRNA | This spreadsheet (Excel 2010) contains the Comparative / Potential ratios for all tetraloops (256 in total) when (1) ignoring flanking base pair and (2) allowing only a CG base pair. |
Comparison of hairpin loop statistical potentials and experiementally-derived free-energy values | This spreadsheet (Excel 2010) contains the absolute difference between our triloop, tetraloop and pentaloop statistical potentials and their corresponding experimentally-derived free-energy values. |
Comparison of internal loop statistical potentials and experiementally-derived free-energy values | This spreadsheet (Excel 2010) contains the absolute difference between our 1x1 and 2x2 internal loop statistical potentials and their corresponding experimentally-derived free-energy values. |